On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:00:48 -0700 milki <[email protected]> mentioned:
> On 11:25 Wed 16 Mar , Eric wrote: > > There are plenty of outstanding PRs regarding portupgrade, which does seem > > to suffer from being both loved and unloved (in terms of maintenance). I > > personally use it, but am wondering if it's time to switch to Doug's > > PortMaster now... However given that portupgrade is often noted in > > documentation as almost the default tool for doing upgrades of ports then it > > does seem sensible that we should all try our best to fix it. > > I've been hanging out at #bsdports@efnet and I've gathered that is the > consensus of committers that portupgrade is no longer maintained and > portmaster is the preferred tool. The docs need some patching to reflect > this. > It's not true, it's officially maintained by ruby@, which for portupgrade was effectively mainly me for the past years. Unfortunately, I don't have enough resources to make significant changes there. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
