On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:52:16 -0400 Steve Wills <[email protected]> mentioned:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/16/11 07:25, Eric wrote: > >> From: paranormal <[email protected]> > > [SNIP] > >> This is good idea. But beautiful port portupgrade :), > >> not work with 1.9 version. > > > > What about ports/144605 - "[PATCH] Get ports-mgmt/portupgrade to build under > > Ruby 1.9.1" > > > > I've not tried it, but does that patch do what it says on the tin? > > [...] > > > There are plenty of outstanding PRs regarding portupgrade, which does seem > > to suffer from being both loved and unloved (in terms of maintenance). I > > personally use it, but am wondering if it's time to switch to Doug's > > PortMaster now... However given that portupgrade is often noted in > > documentation as almost the default tool for doing upgrades of ports then it > > does seem sensible that we should all try our best to fix it. > > > > I personally think we should still aim to get to the default of 1.9 and > > aiming for the 9.0 release seems a sensible target to go for, if part of > > that process would seem to be getting portupgrade sorted then so be it. > > Portupgrade is a bit of a problem. Perhaps it's due to my patches, but > at the moment I can't get databases/ruby-bdb to build with RUBY_VER == > 1.9. If I could get past that, I could test the above PR. I wonder if > anyone else has the same issue. > It does not work with 1.9. I submitted some pacthes to fix it, but it's not enough to get it build. IIRC, there were some other problems knu@ mentioned. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
