On 8/23/2012 9:28 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:47:54 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 23:12 +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:50:46 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > > > > > > With both the doc and ports repositories now moved to SVN it has been > > > > decided to not export the 9.1 release branch activity to CVS. So > > > > csup/cvsup update mechanisms are not available for updating to > 9.1-RC1. > > > > If you would like to use SVN the branch to use is releng/9.1. > > > > > > Assuming the stupid question is the one you didn't ask, just to clarify: > > > does this mean that c*sup won't work with these RCs in particular, or > > > that CVS is dead and SVN becomes mandatory from 9.1-RELEASE? > > > > > > cheers, Ian > > > > > > > The latter. If you are not using FreeBSD-Update to handle the updates > > of a machine you'll need to update your source tree using SVN for > > release branches (releng/*) from now on. Updates of the CVS repository > > will continue for the existing stable/* and head for now. I don't think > > anything has been decided on when that will stop. > > Thanks Ken. I'm a bit POLAxed; guess I don't read enough lists ..
I'm a bit surprised too. Shouldn't this mean svn should be in base? If not, should csup come OUT of base? Bryan _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
