On 31 December 2012 15:40, Chris H <chris#@1command.com> wrote: > Sigh... > IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel > left out.
SVN has a number of features which makes development much easier. What did you find easier to accomplish with CVS than with SVN? > Are there _any_ CVS servers/trunks/tree's left? If so, how _current_ are > they? Ports and Source currently have CVS trees. Ports has an explicit EoL on February 28th (2 months from today) Source does not have an explicit EoL though it *is* considered deprecated. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
