2016-12-12 20:38, Christian Schwarz wrote:
With the new jail parameters, new namespaces for SysV IPC are possible
on FreeBSD 11.

For those ezjail users, add something like this to the jail's config
after creating it using 'ezjail-admin create':

export jail_postgres_parameters="sysvmsg=new sysvsem=new sysvshm=new"

Cheers,
  Christian


Thank you, this is it!
I missed it in the JAIL(8) man page, and is not mentioned in release notes.


Now if only the iocage would recognized the sysvmsg, sysvsem, and sysvshm
options:

# iocage set sysvmsg='new' xxx
  ERROR: Unsupported property: sysvmsg!

I guess I should file a bug report.


  Mark



man 8 jail
 ...
 allow.sysvipc
      A process within the jail has access to System V IPC
      primitives.  This is deprecated in favor of the per-
      module parameters (see below).  When this parameter is
      set, it is equivalent to setting sysvmsg, sysvsem, and
      sysvshm all to ``inherit''.
 ...

   sysvmsg
      Allow access to SYSV IPC message primitives.  If set to
      ``inherit'', all IPC objects on the system are visible to this
      jail, whether they were created by the jail itself, the base
      system, or other jails.  If set to ``new'', the jail will have
      its own key namespace, and can only see the objects that it has
      created; the system (or parent jail) has access to the jail's
      objects, but not to its keys.  If set to ``disable'', the jail
      cannot perform any sysvmsg-related system calls.

    sysvsem, sysvshm
      Allow access to SYSV IPC semaphore and shared memory primitives,
      in the same manner as sysvmsg.

Regarding installation of PostgreSQL in a FreeBSD jail, the web hold plenty of warnings/advice that each postgres instance should have a unique UID, otherwise
they stumble across each other's feet:

| allow.sysvipc
| A process within the jail has access to System V IPC primitives. In the | current jail implementation, System V primitives share a single namespace | across the host and jail environments, meaning that processes within a jail | would be able to communicate with (and potentially interfere with) processes
 | outside of the jail, and in other jails.


Is this still the case in FreeBSD 11.0 ???

I remember hearing rumors that the System V namespace
no longer is (will?) be shared across jails.
(Couldn't find it being mentioned in release notes.)

  Mark
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to