NAGY Andreas wrote:
>Okay, that was the main reason for using NFS 4.1.
>Is it planned to implement it, or is the focus on pNFS?
I took a quick look and implementing this for some cases will be pretty
easy. Binding a FORE channel is implied, so for that case all the server
does is reply OK to the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION.

To know if the ESXi client case is a simple one, I need to see what the
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION arguments look like.
If you can capture packets for when this second connection is done and
email it to me as an attachment, I can look at what the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION 
args are.
# tcpdump -s 0 -w <file.pcap> host <client-host-for-this-connection>
run on the FreeBSD server should get the <file.pcap> I need.

Alternately, if you have wireshark handy, you can just use it to look
for the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION request and see if it specifies
(FORE, BACK, FORE_OR_BOTH or BACK_OR_BOTH) in it.
FORE or FORE_OR_BOTH means it is easy to do and I can probably have
a patch for testing in a day or two.

rick
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to