On 6/9/20, Jonathan Chen <j...@chen.org.nz> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 15:09, Donald Wilde <dwil...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] >> On the specific synth crash, If I re-run it, does synth have code that >> reorders failed ports such that it has a better chance of not having >> such swap-space faults/failures happen? > > No, it doesn't. > > However, if you're experiencing crashes it may be better for you to > lower your "Number_of_builders" and/or "Max_jobs_per_builder" in your > /usr/local/etc/synth/synth.ini. > Thanks, Jon. I'll look at that after this finishes and after I fix the known OOPS I caused myself.
What happened is that it was building both llvm80 and gcc9 at the same time. I can see that now it's building llvm90 and it's been at it for over 2 hours. Obviously this is going to become a problem again although the next time I build a disk I can use more of it for swap. It's not processor speed that is the problem now, although if I alter those parameters what is now 11 hours will become 20. Such is life with "old" computers... :D -- Don Wilde **************************************************** * What is the Internet of Things but a system * * of systems including humans? * **************************************************** _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
