In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp
>processor type ? if needed, I could submit a PR.
AthlonXP is same as AthlonMP. It's better of the name "palomino",
isn't it? (But "morgan" Duron will have same feature such as SSE.)
What is the best name of the AMD's CPU core that can use SSE?
>Index: bsd.cpu.mk
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk,v
>retrieving revision 1.2.2.4
>diff -u -r1.2.2.4 bsd.cpu.mk
>@@ -28,8 +30,10 @@
>
> .if !defined(NO_CPU_CFLAGS) || !defined(NO_CPU_COPTFLAGS)
> . if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386"
>-. if ${CPUTYPE} == "k7"
>+. if ${CPUTYPE} == "xp"
> _CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will
>+. elif ${CPUTYPE} == "k7"
>+_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will
> . elif ${CPUTYPE} == "k6-2"
> _CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6
> . elif ${CPUTYPE} == "k6"
My dual AthlonXP is offen better performance at "-mcpu=i686" than "-mk6".
(gcc 2.95.3)
My dual AthlonXP's WWW page(in Japanese,sorry):
http://kobe1995.net/~kaz/FreeBSD/AthlonDual.html
Thank you & sorry for my poor English.
--
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NAKAMURA Kazushi@KOBE
<http://kobe1995.net/~kaz/index-e.html>
- Break the hate chain. No more kill!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
