Gerhard Sittig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:57 -0600, David Syphers wrote:
> > [ ... surprise ... ] As others have pointed out this behavior is
> > documented, but we must remember that a variable name itself is the most
> > important and immediate documentation. And having a firewall load when
> > firewall_enable is NO is complete nonsense.
> So maybe the variables should be named a little longer to fully
> describe their effect? Like
> firewall_ruleset_script_run_enable_when_set_to_yes?
If you're going to do it, do it right:
firewall_load_ipfw_if_needed_then_run_ruleset_script_when_set_to_yes
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
