On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 19:00 +0100, Nikolaj Hansen wrote:
> I also do not think it belongs in the stable branch just yet :-D Any hope
> of you fixing the old vinum in the 5.3 branch or is it a wait for the 5.4?
AFAIK, the old vinum will *never* be "fixed" in the 5.3 branch or any
subsequent branch, so don't hold your breath for 5.4. The fact that it
wasn't being fully GEOM-ified (and hence was dying from neglect in 5.x)
was the whole reason for Lukas to embark on geom_vinum.
Geom_vinum *is* vinum for all intents and purposes, from this point on.
The alternative to not having geom_vinum in the stable branch would be
not to have vinum support at all.
Cheers,
Paul.
PS: If you're unhappy with geom_vinum stability and performance, and
you're using it mainly to do software RAID 1 (as opposed to using it for
its LVM features), you might consider using geom_mirror instead. I
converted one of my root-on-geom_vinum mirrored systems over to a
bootable geom_mirror. (I did it in-place, too.) Right now, geom_mirror
will load-balance reads across disks, whereas geom_vinum does not, which
is something in geom_mirror's favour.
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
--- Frank Vincent Zappa
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
