Scott Long writes: >No it doesn't. See the gymnastics that Bill Paul had to do recently in >the iee80211 code to get around the insane inlining that gcc does with >-O2. I'm not saying that gcc produces incorrect code, but I am saying >that there is very strong evidence that it produces code that is >incompatible with the restrictions inherent to the kernel, mainly that >stack space is not infinite.
I wonder how this is being done elsewhere, on NetBSD, everything is built with -O2 and has been for several years afair. Not that I care much about it but apparently it doesn't seem to be such a big problem everywhere? mkb. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"