On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:04:57PM -0700, secmgr wrote: > Whatever you do, don't complain about it on this list, or you'll just be > told that if you really wanted raid, you should be running SCSI disks > and a raid adapter. They may allow that 3ware does ok, but no ATA drive > should ever be relied on and even s/w raid on scsi is only for ignorant > lusers who are too cheap to do the "right thing". > Those who think I run to hyperbole need only visit the archives.
I know what you mean but I think this write-up is a bit too harsh. As long as the goal is to get _as reliable as possible_ without spending too much money, I think software RAID has its niche. Besides, I've seen a few hardware RAID controllers having issues themselves (and they weren't the cheapest ones available either). > One can only hope that gvinum actually works in 6 vs the buggy and > incomplete alpha code that shipped in 5.x. Having a man page is nice, > but I'd rather have a raid 5 set that didn't panic the system and > corrupt the set when it lost a drive (and this with modern scsi drives > and adapter). I haven't seen this (luckily!). I do know that sometime in 5.x there was a RAID-5 bug in gvinum but then again the whole vinum/gvinum transition was pretty dodgy back then. This is why I waited until 6.x to migrate. > I'd strongly suggest anyone using GEOM raid to do some > fault insertion testing of their setup prior to actually relying on it. I did. It worked. --Stijn -- There are of course many problems connected with life, of which some of the most popular are 'Why are people born?', 'Why do they die?', and `Why do they spend so much of the intervening time wearing digital watches?' -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy"
pgpjc3SVsnCEy.pgp
Description: PGP signature