Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:17:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I have no objection to doing that, so long as you are actually doing it >> correctly. This example shows that each jail must have its own SysV >> semaphore key space, else information leaks anyway.
> By default SysV shared memory is disallowed in jails. Hm, the present problem seems to be about semaphores not shared memory ... although I'd not be surprised to find that there's a similar issue around shared memory. Anyway, if FBSD's position is that they are uninterested in supporting SysV IPC in connection with jails, then I think the Postgres project position has to be that we are uninterested in supporting Postgres inside FBSD jails. Sorry Marc :-( regards, tom lane _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"