Stephen Clark wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Alexey Karagodov wrote: >> >> >>> hi. >>> i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to >>> make >>> two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they >>> supporting old version, lower then 6.0 >>> i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you >>> don't >>> finish old, 6.0 ?! >>> finish 6.0, make it work, and upgrade it to 7.0 and to 8.0 and to 9.0 >>> and so >>> on ... >>> what so new and revolutionary in 7.0 in comparison with 6.0 ?! >>> to use your system i must be a DEVELOPER, but i don't have so much >>> time! i >>> don't want to develope! i want to use, i want to help you with some >>> advise ( >>> e.g. what feature to add, what feature to change etc), i can and i >>> want to >>> share some of my hardware to feet your needs, make a mirror, make a test >>> server/workstation/notebook/PDA etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. >>> i'm just >>> admin and a user. >>> your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is >>> SOLARIS. >>> but your's is so unstable ... >>> >> >> All this is described in many places. It all comes down to this: if you >> don't want to be a developer, JUST USE THE RELEASE BRANCH. That means >> Releng_6_0 for now. >> >> Stable only means compatible to previous versions of the same branch. >> Not that the system is stable. >> > Who in their right mind would think that "stable" actually means > "stable"!!!
It does mean that the API is stable. /\ || So that you can use a driver written for 6.0 on any 6.x build. And that you can run software compiled for 6.0 on all following versions of the 6.x branch without a compatibility layer. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"