Vivek Khera schrieb:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:23 PM, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote:
-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a stable
and working operating system.
Hahahahaha... That's ironic...
No, just misinterpretation of which attribute of the system to which
the word "stable" applies.
Do you really think I misinterpreted the meaning of -STABLE? *I* think
most people misinterprete -STABLE because the first thing that comes to
mind is runtime stability. The same issue exists in the GNU/Debian Linux
world: Debian stable doesn't mean that the system run always rock-solid
and works perfectly, but rather the state of software is stable, i.e.
maintainers ensure 100% compatibility between updates.
Regards
Björn
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
