On 11-09-2012 16:10, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-09-11 15:24, Steve Kargl wrote: >> What is important is whether software built with clang functions >> correctly. See for example, >> >> http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp > > Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of > clang's (really llvm's) weaker points. It is currently not really a > high priority item for upstream. > > This is obviously something that a certain part of our userbase will > care a lot about, while most of the time they won't care so much about > licensing or politics. So those people are probably better off using > gcc for the time being.
Does it affect the accuracy of libm functions?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
