On 09/11/12 09:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-09-11 16:27, Tijl Coosemans wrote:> On 11-09-2012 16:10,
Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of
clang's (really llvm's) weaker points. It is currently not really a
high priority item for upstream.
This is obviously something that a certain part of our userbase will
care a lot about, while most of the time they won't care so much about
licensing or politics. So those people are probably better off using
gcc for the time being.
Does it affect the accuracy of libm functions?
It seems to, at least in specific cases; Steve posted about this in an
earlier thread on -current:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120905221310.GA97847
_______________________________________________
If true, this is a serious problem, especially for those of us who use
FreeBSD in a scientific computing environment.
-Nathan
_______________________________________________
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
