on 25/01/2013 16:10 David Chisnall said the following: > On 25 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following: >>> This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at >>> DevSummits in the past, without any objections being raised. >> >> A simple test - has there been a core decision that no GPL software must be >> shipped with 10.x? > > There can be no such decision until it's all of the bits of GPL'd code in base > have replacements in and testing has happened.
I disagree. Core can make a decision to set a goal. > That is why it is a plan, not > an accomplished goal. Right. The question is - is this a plan set by Core, and so a Project's Plan, or is this a plan that individual project members have set for themselves? As long as there are no conflicts in plans or objections to the plan the distinction is insignificant, but not longer. > This is why we have the wiki page tracking the progress > of replacements: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/GPLinBase OK. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
