On 06/ 8/16 07:09 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 09 Jun 2016, at 00:30, Jung-uk Kim <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> On 06/ 8/16 06:16 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 08 Jun 2016, at 23:54, Jung-uk Kim <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 06/ 8/16 05:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>>>> On 08 Jun 2016, at 21:11, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I got a user report, and could reproduce this, that building >>>>>> GCC (lang/gcc, but also current HEAD, so probably pretty much >>>>>> any version) with FreeBSD 11 and LANG = en_US.UTF-8 we get >>>>>> conflicting entires in $BUILDDIR/gcc/options.h such as >>> ... >>>>> Note that GNU awk does *not* produce a different optionlist file when >>>>> used with either LANG=C or LANG=en_US.UTF-8. >>> ... >>>>> So I am assuming that the ARRAY[j-1] > ARRAY[j] comparison works >>>>> differently in our awk, depending on the LANG settings. No idea when >>>>> that changed, though, if it changed at all... >>>> >>>> This behaviour is known for very long time: >>>> >>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/173731 >>>> >>>> and it is not our fault: >>>> >>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/html_node/POSIX-String-Comparison.html >>> >>> >>> Indeed, so the real question is: why does this only started coming up >>> now, if it is known since 2007? I have been building gcc ports for >>> ages, and never ran into this problem, but I also have never actively >>> used a persistent LANG environment variable, let alone with UTF-8 in it. >>> >>> Is this because more people started using UTF-8 recently? >> >> We are doing more correct collation now: >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/290494 > > Indeed. This problem has come up before on the ports mailing list, > almost immediately after that commit: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-November/101034.html > > Apparently some proposals were made to set LANG and LC_ALL to C globally > for port builds, but it was never implemented?
tijl proposed it but never implemented because of difficulties to exp-run the change, it seems. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151127145552.GA19655 > I guess more people are now noticing it, because they are trying out the > 11.0-ALPHA installers. Which is good. :-) Jung-uk Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature