Hi Sini, On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Sini Ruohomaa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, i18n, > > I understand this comes a bit late for the string freeze happening > tomow-...today, but I figure you can use them later anyway if it won't > make it here. > > #: data/nation/aztec.ruleset:30 > msgid "Cihualahtoani" > msgstr "Cihuatlàtoani" > > Typo: msgid should be Cihuatlahtoani, +t. >
This is a title that has been removed between 2.2 and 2.3, namely through the patch at http://gna.org/patch/index.php?2144 I suggest removing it in 2.2 too instead of fixing the spelling. :) > #: data/nation/chola.ruleset:7 > msgid "" > "The Cholas were a Tamil dynasty centered in southern India and were > rare in " > "their level of influence in northern India. They began as a tributary > state " > "to the Pallavas, but in the 9th century their power began to grow. > During " > "the 11th century, they led expeditions against other Indian states as > far " > "north as Bengal, as well as against the Maldives, Sri Lanka and even > the " > "Indonesian kingdom of Sri Vijaya. They collapsed, however, in the 1250s > as " > "other southern Indian states rose up." > > What does "were rare in their level of influence" really mean? From > Wikipedia, I get the impression they mostly ruled southern India, so > does it mean they had little influence, or, as it literally means (I > think), were somehow unusually influential in northern India? > > Best regards, > > --Sini > > My interpretation is that the Cholas were relatively influential for being _Tamils_ (and not Indo-European Indians who traditionally have dominated the north of the subcontinent.) Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ Freeciv-i18n mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-i18n
