Hi, some comments on your comments...That's another argument that I like: low cost to implement it. A third opinion (or more) for the untie?
HIMEM /INT15H=... should not be extremely hard to do, so I vote for it.
Eric, you say DOS5 we have it more or less, I just watch the TODO list and tell you: problems with PRINT and FORMAT, and some other utilities with bugs to be fixed, so even there not quite.
Ok, so shall we open a bank account so that we developers contribute to this purchase to PC-TOOLS and Symantec??DOS 6.0 not really - our EMM386 is limited, MEMMAKER not existing at all, ClamAV clamscan can replace MSAV, a VSAFE would be nice (I would like to start such a project, who wants to help? Rob?), DBLSPACE would have to be removed 0.21 versions later due to license issues ;-), BACKUP would be bought from PC-Tools, DEFRAG would be bought from Norton/Symantec,
(sorry, just kidding, couldn't resist ;-))
More opinions on thissome others like Win 3.11 compat should probably be fixed before we call it FreeDOS 1.0 ...
Congrats if you have reached the end of this mail 8-).Thanks indeed. This is what I meant when I said I wanted CONCISE mails... :-(
Anyway thanks for your opinion, I knew you were going to be verbose even with my notice...
Aitor
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
