tOn Sun, 24 Jul 2005 03:18:45 +0200, you wrote: Hi,
>> But sadly, FreeDOS still not v1.0, that means it's still have some >> kind of bugs. >which is cause, which is consequence? ;-) Chicken and Eggs :-) Better to say this way: If FreeDOS are DONE, no more MS-DOS! >I agree with this, and if simplicity in the number of versions available >is an issue, have 386+ and 8088 versions (being 286+ optimized is ok >whenever possible, and whenever the differences between the >286-optimized and 386-optimized versions are small. >Furthermore, this is something already done, I assume, but such versions >should clearly say "386+ optimised version" or "8088 version" clearly in >the /?, or this may become a nightmare of versions when a user reports bugs. 100% agree to your idea. For a better and simpler way to distribute, separate 8086 and 80386+ will let users "easier" to understand. Since most of the compiler/assembler have a 8086/80386 optimize parameter, it should be quite easy to get 2 version within a minutes. Rgds, Johnson. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
