but those have more-or-less _become_ a standard for DOS users. On 6/13/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > 13-Июн-2006 18:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to > freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: > > BC> Basically, the OW is ok with the functions,as long as they are > BC> prepended with an underscore or something to prevent pollution of the > BC> namespace, so #defining __TURBOC_FUNCS__ would then be necessary to > BC> use them. > >> AFAIR, Blair offers to OW team some library functions, to increase > >> Borland compatibility. Don't know their current state. > > Issue is not (only) in namespace pollution: after all, in OW headers > you may find many non-standard names (like int86() or sound()) without > underscores, and all happy with them. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >
-- Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. David Letterman (1947 - ) See ya _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
