Hi!
13-Июн-2006 22:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC> but those have more-or-less _become_ a standard for DOS users.
>> BC> Basically, the OW is ok with the functions,as long as they are
>> BC> prepended with an underscore or something to prevent pollution of the
>> BC> namespace, so #defining __TURBOC_FUNCS__ would then be necessary to
>> BC> use them.
>> >> AFAIR, Blair offers to OW team some library functions, to increase
>> >> Borland compatibility. Don't know their current state.
>> Issue is not (only) in namespace pollution: after all, in OW headers
>> you may find many non-standard names (like int86() or sound()) without
>> underscores, and all happy with them.
Of course. But difference is that for OW team Borland's names are less
"de-facto standard", than for us.
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
