I haven't seen any replies in this thread that argue Subversion is a bad idea, but let's make this a FINAL CALL before we go ahead. If no one speaks up by this time tomorrow, I think Bart gets the go-ahead to convert the FreeDOS CVS to Subversion on SourceForge.
When did you plan to do the conversion? This weekend, I assume? (I'll want to be sure to make note of it on the web site.) -jh On 5/15/07, Bart Oldeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/15/07, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have no objection to SVN, but I haven't edited any sources in a > > while so maybe I'm not a good person to chime in. :-) > > > > If we do decide to migrate to Subversion, we should use the SVN > > repository on SourceForge (it's not activated yet, but it's there to > > be used.) This helps to keep all FreeDOS-related resources in one > > place. > > yes, of course, that's the idea. Also, to have the directories > structured like this: > > root > \kernel\trunk > \branches\UNSTABLE > \jhall > \tags\.... > \freecom\trunk > \... > \install\... > \mem\... > > instead of the default you'd get from cvs2svn that looks like this: > > root > \trunk\kernel > \freecom > \... > \branches\UNSTABLE > \jhall > \jimtabor > \expExec > \... > \tags\com083beta7 > \ke2035a > \... > > The problem is that in this default layout all branches are lumped > together without you always knowing if it's freecom or kernel without > looking inside > > well, I can provide a dump file if it gets the go ahead. > > Bart > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
