Yes, Robert Riebisch is right. The licence for the original LCC sources is quite another one then the licence from Jacob Navia. Otherwise I would not have started this project. I'm aware that you are interested in free software with no restrictions. It's quite the same with me. That's the reason I'm writing these letters. So, what I want to know is, if anybody here on FreeDos would be interested in a C-Compiler (LCC) and a C-Interpreter (EiC). And if there is interest, how do I upload my packages for testing.
Detlef Reimers Am 10.06.2010, 14:35 Uhr, schrieb Robert Riebisch <r...@bttr-software.de>: > Tom Ehlert wrote: > >> according to http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/ >> LCC is not free. >> License: >> ' This software is not freeware, it is copyrighted by Jacob Navia. It's >> free >> for non-commercial use, if you use it professionally you have to have >> to buy a licence.' >> >> why would anybody use that ? > > Wait...! The website you are mentioning is about LCC-Win32 by Jacob > Navia, > not the original LCC by Christopher Fraser and Dave Hanson. Detlef said > "I > took the UNIX sources from Hanson's website...", so correct license file > is <http://drh.svnrepository.com/svn/lcc/trunk/CPYRIGHT>. > > Robert Riebisch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel