Yes, Robert Riebisch is right. The licence for the original LCC sources is  
quite another one then
the licence from Jacob Navia. Otherwise I would not have started this  
project. I'm aware that
you are interested in free software with no restrictions. It's quite the  
same with me. That's the
reason I'm writing these letters. So, what I want to know is, if anybody  
here on FreeDos would
be interested in a C-Compiler (LCC) and a C-Interpreter (EiC). And if  
there is interest, how do
I upload my packages for testing.

Detlef Reimers


Am 10.06.2010, 14:35 Uhr, schrieb Robert Riebisch <r...@bttr-software.de>:

> Tom Ehlert wrote:
>
>> according to http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/
>> LCC is not free.
>> License:
>>  ' This software is not freeware, it is copyrighted by Jacob Navia. It's
>> free
>>  for non-commercial use, if you use it professionally you have to have
>>  to buy a licence.'
>>
>> why would anybody use that ?
>
> Wait...! The website you are mentioning is about LCC-Win32 by Jacob  
> Navia,
> not the original LCC by Christopher Fraser and Dave Hanson. Detlef said  
> "I
> took the UNIX sources from Hanson's website...", so correct license file
> is <http://drh.svnrepository.com/svn/lcc/trunk/CPYRIGHT>.
>
> Robert Riebisch



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to