Le 26.05.2015 01:10, Rugxulo a écrit : >> As for FreeDOS, well, the shell was really slow. My original idea was to >> get rid of Microsoft and get more features thanks to FreeDOS, but it was >> really too slow. > If something specific like "DIR" or "COPY" were too slow, that would > be nice to know. But FreeCOM (shell) is quite a beast, so it's fairly > complex (and has no current maintainer). If you want to try again > (presumably with 0.84-pre2 but maybe also 0.82pl3), go ahead. It would > be nice to know the exact commands that are bottlenecks for you. But > there may not be any huge fixes any time soon. So, for now, a > workaround would be to use third-party tools (under FreeDOS, not > MS-DOS, natch) that are faster (e.g. 1dir or Zcopy or whatever, I > can't remember everything). >
Are you trying to say that Microsoft's DOS and COMMAND.COM are much more optimized than FreeDOS/FreeCOM :-) ? I will give it try again when I have some time. Since yesterday, there are 201+ machines in the TOPBENCH database ;-) Cheers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
