Could you share the specific floppy/RAM options for VirtualBox and what version you are running?
I was able to build the kernel from Linux with OpenWatcom 1.9 and run it in VirtualBox (v6.1 32MB RAM, 1.44MB floppy, no hard drive) and on my P1-75 (24MB RAM, 1.44 and 1.2MB floppy and 2GB CF). The defaults there (config.m) were 386+ and FAT32. It looks like it has the same defaults in config.b. How are you getting from the built kernel + sys to a bootable image? I wasn't sure if I could just use the FAT12 bootsector unmodified (sys.c looks like it does some patching), so I booted into MS-DOS and used the install.bat from bin to SYS A: and grabbed the built command.com from ibiblio. I was unable to successfully complete the build in Windows 7 with either mingw32-make or build.bat. I'll spend more time poking at this another day. --Andy On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:02 PM tom ehlert <t...@drivesnapshot.de> wrote: > > Does it make a difference on your computer if the kernel is > > compiled for 386+ vs 86+ ? Was this on real computer or virtual? > > it was a VirtualBox machine. > > I only changed in build.bat from build.b the compiler setting, using > OCWIN, so it probably was 8086 > > of course I have a very specific floppy, RAM setup aso. > > however at this point ("GO!") almost all of this is irrelevant. > > > > if that helps, I can upload the contents of the resulting > freedos-master\* directory. > > > > > Tom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > -- --Andy
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel