> On Jan 31, 2023, at 8:55 AM, tom ehlert <t...@drivesnapshot.de> wrote: > > >> The main difference between using VBADOS and EtherDFS would come >> down to the DOS machine. If running DOS inside VirtualBox, VBADOS >> would most likely be the easiest to setup and use. However, using >> EtherDFS works under other Virtual Machines and with real hardware. > > EtherDFS should work for any (at least most) Virtual machines which s > good. > > However it requires a linux machine to connect to which is bad. > > VBADOS should work with any VirtualBox on whatever OS which is good. > > Tom
Yep. It would be great if EtherDFS had some easy to run server-side software for other major OS/platforms like Mac, Linux, Android, etc. That and lack of LFN support are the two main issues with using EtherDFS. And like you say… if you’re just using VirtualBox, VBADOS is a lot easier. :-) > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
