On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 22:57, Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
<freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025, Liam Proven via Freedos-devel wrote:
>
> > I was wrong. One module is in Turbo Pascal but the rest is indeed VB
> > DOS or MS Basic PDS 7.1.

I must be missing several things here.

What is "QBX"? Google does not help. Is this a nickname for the BASIC
PDS? Is it some kind of BASIC-to-C compiler?

Is it part of the PDS? This implies so:
https://www.pcjs.org/documents/books/mspl13/basic/b7start/

> Hm.  Converting from QBX 7 to something like Watcom or DJGPP would be a
> LOT easier

I do not understand. How can you compile BASIC code with these C compilers?

Why, indeed, would you want to? Wouldn't FBC be much easier?

>  than converting from VBDOS (safe insofar as VBDOS code can be
> written that is in fact just QBX code).

Well, he says it is and can. I don't know. I didn't know that was
possible either, but I spent a total of maybe 1 hour playing with VB
for DOS about 25 years ago.

> When I first started learning C, most of my code was written in QBX.  I
> can still operate in both languages.

Without knowing what "QBX" is I can't parse this.

-- 
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
IoM: (+44) 7624 227612: UK: (+44) 7939-087884
Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053


_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to