> My preference would be the much simpler route and only include > programs that work on the popular (well known & supported) virtual > machines and on real hardware. I think the issue is a few games. So > maybe that means we wouldn't include some games in "1.5" or "2.0" (or > whatever comes after "1.4") and we would include some others.
I would think it would be pretty hard to define "well known and supported", and I'm sure there would be some (probably heated) disagreement about what should and shouldn't be on that list. Especially with games, you would probably also need some configuration info on what might be needed in different VMs (like SLOWDOWN). Also, this really isn't just limited to games. As I'm working on some of my low-level utility programs I come across VMs that don't work for one reason or another. This is more often the case with DOSBox than a VM that uses a "real" DOS instead of a virtualized DOS, but I have problems with various VMs. _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
