On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> 24-сав-2004 16:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> BO> fbp by bp->buffer[foo] really doesn't produce better code for Watcom.
> BO> There is a good reason why I didn't apply these blockio.c patches either.
>
> :) For OW I don't review listings yet, only for BC. I plan do this for
> OW today-tomorrow, though, this is much longer (up to 10 minutes with BC for
> recompilation, up to 20 with OW). Probably, I should force my efforts in
> optimization of makefile (collect names of changed files in one file, then
> pass this list at once for compilation).
if you want to check things quickly, simply do
wcc -i..\hdr -os -r -s -j -d1 -DWITHFAT32 foo.c
(perhaps via some batch file)
wcc (wpp neither) can't compile multiple files at the sametime. You can
only try to decrease the load time of wcc.exe Maybe compressing it or
binding with a dos extender helps. Maybe not.
wpp is not good -- the kernel is written in C, not C++, and some small
differences like sizeof('a') (1 in C++, sizeof(int) in C) maybe
responsible for what you see. It's also bigger so just slows things down.
Bart
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg297
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
