Hi! 24-Апр-2004 17:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> recompilation, up to 20 with OW). Probably, I should force my efforts in >> optimization of makefile (collect names of changed files in one file, then >> pass this list at once for compilation). BO> if you want to check things quickly, simply do BO> wcc -i..\hdr -os -r -s -j -d1 -DWITHFAT32 foo.c BO> (perhaps via some batch file) I do so for BC (with -S option). :) Ask again: how you get listings for inthndlr.c? When I dsiasm it, then second half of listing was not contain sources (desyncronization?). BO> wcc (wpp neither) can't compile multiple files at the sametime. You can ______________O\_/_________________________________\_/O______________ fc=<file_name> (C++ only) specify file of command lines to be batch processed (see fc=<file_name>) _____________________________________________________________________ O/~\ /~\O BO> only try to decrease the load time of wcc.exe Maybe compressing it or BO> binding with a dos extender helps. Maybe not. Hm. May be try the 32lite exepacker? Though, don't sure if this help (much) - WCC already runs from Stacker volume. BO> wpp is not good -- the kernel is written in C, not C++, and some small BO> differences like sizeof('a') (1 in C++, sizeof(int) in C) maybe BO> responsible for what you see. ? I not use WPP with kernel (yet). Also, should be unimportant by which compiler compiled compiler, if its sources are valid. BO> It's also bigger so just slows things down. Yes, WPP is 50% longer. :( ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg297 _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel