On Mon, 10 May 2004, [UTF-8] Aitor SantamarÃa Merino wrote: Hallo,
> This is actually not true. The reference compiler for the FreeDOS > project is, if I remember correcly, BC3.0. Hm, wasn't it Turbo C 3.0 ;-) > But the purpose of this mail is to encourage to change this spec, at > least to admit OW (add, if not replace BC3) as reference compiler too, > if license allows that (I mean is true open source and there are no > other woes). I am not quite used to OW, but it seems like a pretty good > compiler, seems to be open source and be under development (which is Actually, I would support this change in the Manifesto. Due to the facts already mentioned often: Open, free, active. The decission made for TC3.0 was at a time no compiler met the requirements, now OW does. Although, I would also keep the doing of the past to not press people to have to port project too heavily to OpenWatcom. However, it would be good to have a fd-doc for Newbies about OW in action. I had put together would was posted here into: http://freedos.sourceforge.net/freecom/ow.html Bye, -- Steffen Kaiser ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
