On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de> wrote: > > Hi Bart, > > thanks for making the patch much shorter, very "commitable" now :-) > > Why did our old code do that complex "put bp at [bp+2]" thing? And don't know
> what does the "cpm_error jump decision now inverted" patch mean? skips the call to int21 if the value in cl is > 24h, ie limits the call to int 21h functions 0-24h before it incorrectly limited the calls to functions > 24h > > Eric > >> This is a minimal fix for [entry.asm] > ... > ... >> cmp cl,024h >> - jbe cpm_error >> + ja cpm_error > ... > Jeremy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
