Hi Christian, I think that you are not being polite.
You are new here and you start by wanting to change everything. Why don't you start by fixing a few bugs? Alain Christian Masloch escreveu: >>> Which app crashes from running on a FAT+ kernel? (Presuming you don't >>> even >>> have that large files, or that the app doesn't access these files.) >>> Excluding low-level disk utilities such as defragmenting or disk >>> checking >>> programs of course, because EVERY new or extended filesystem breaks >>> them. >> each and every general file handling program like: >> COPY, XCOPY, Norton/Volkow Commander, ... >> ZIP, RAR, ... >> CHKDSK (and don't tell me CHKDSK isn't important), all Norton stuff >> xxBACKUP >> >> while they probably won't crash, some wont to what they >> are expected to do. >> >> Are you prepared to check the entire ecosystem of DOS utilities if >> they can handle 4GB+ size files ? >> >> it's probably MUCH a better idea to teach this hypotetical blueray >> player to handle multiple files. >> >> that's the reason I think that 4GB+ is a real stupid idea. > > >>> (Presuming you don't even >>> have that large files, or that the app doesn't access these files.) > > I don't think copy or archive utilities would care if they won't access > the large files. > >>> Excluding low-level disk utilities such as defragmenting or disk >>> checking >>> programs of course, because EVERY new or extended filesystem breaks >>> them. > > I would describe CHKDSK as "defragmenting or disk checking program". I > mean, did you even READ my mail? It's not like you have to, but please do > if you're going to answer it. > > >>> DOS-C's FAT+ support could be set by default >> I don't care what you do to DOS-C. but the FreeDOS kernel shouldn't >> support FAT+ > > Yo, as mentioned in the previous mails, I refer to the FreeDOS kernel as > DOS-C. And maybe you're right, and the FreeDOS kernel needs forking for > every feature. > >>> Since DOS-C doesn't (yet) support FAT16 file systems larger than 4 GiB >> yes another stupid idea. >> >>> , FAT16+ is no option anyway. >> right. > > Sometimes I think your mails aren't worth an answer. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial > Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables > unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine > for externally facing server and web deployment. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-kernel mailing list > Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
