Hi Aitor, > I support this idea, but that means that odd numbers (2039) would go unstable.
Actually Bart already ported country sys support from unstable, combining it with built-in country support. He is also working on f-node free operations in stable. This means that version 2039 will be the next version of stable. I think it also means that we will gradually port more things from unstable into the stable branch, but have no new unstable versions (-numbers) to be released in the next few months. It would be good to update the wiki page about unstable here... http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/freedos/index.php?title=Unstable_Kernel_Branch ...to have a better view on which features are "port-worthy". I agree that the freedos distro should by default include the stable branch of the kernel :-). Note that the discussion in mid-may was about experimental filesystems. I still think it would be better to play with those only in the unstable branch. That branch can serve as testing ground for experimental things and as a pool for carefully (!) porting features into stable. Of course it would be useful to port some updates from stable to unstable first, to make the unstable branch more useable. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel