At 01:28 PM 1/14/2013, john s wolter wrote:
>"Re:" has become a way to get past Spam filters. 
>Â It also attracts the attention of the reader. 
>Â This could get the reader to open an EMail 
>assuming it was a reply to a message sent. Â It 
>is a form of social engineering.
Any spam filter that would fall for that simply 
doesn't deserve that name and you should swap it 
out for something that works...

The [Spam] tag in the subject has been inserted 
by Sourceforge's spam checker as a warning for 
"the possibility" of being spam, due to the email 
provider that Henrique used for his reply, just check the headers of his post:

>X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
>         See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
>         -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
>         sender-domain
>         0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is 
> commonly abused enduser mail provider
>         (hperon[at]terra.com.br)

Ralf 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to