I tried it with some old, old versions of MASM and got exactly nowhere.
But then again, I have no idea what I'm doing.
Please let us know how it goes!
On 5/22/2020 6:32 AM, Louis Santillan wrote:
I think you're wrong dpirate. I haven't had time to test, but, I would
expect [0] to be able to use MASM & LINK from MS-DOS 2.0 [1] to build
this. I plan to throw some cycles at this.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23269345
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/master/v2.0/bin
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 7:08 AM Andy Stamp <luigi...@gmail.com> wrote:
It looked like this was the x86 output of the meta compiler. I'm going to try
to coax the Watcom Assembler into building it this evening.
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 8:38 AM Deposite Pirate <dpir...@metalpunks.info> wrote:
This cannot be compiled to machine code because it's some kind of meta
assembler to generate assembler for various processor architectures and this
meta assembler is apparently not available. So unless someone goes through the
pain of reverse engineering this meta assembler this is pretty much useless
shit, just like MS-DOS 1.x and 2.x.
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
--
--Andy
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
