> I want to get "1.3" finally wrapped up, and I'd like to have a
> "2.0" someday. The NightDOS folks are working

english is not my first language so i could missread this.

but doesn't 'folks are working' suggest a plurality of human being,
opposed to the reality of a single guy who ever contributed, but is
currently busy with other stuff


>  on their updated  kernel - if they can get it working

currently, after 5+ years of development they have functionality of a
FreeDOS 512 byte bootsector: read a file from FAT16 into memory.
that's it.

>  and still runs all 16-bit DOS applications,
or run *ANY* application.

>  then we could include that as an alternative kernel
> for people who (a) have a more modern system, and (b) opt-in to use it.**


> ** But, NightDOS is a long way from being able to do that. The
> goals of NightDOS are pretty lofty,
and he has not the faintest idea how to get there.


Tom



_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to