Yep, totally clueless over here lmao
Anyway, if anyone here is interested in the actual state of the project as
opposed to accepting the claims of those quick to discountenance and slow to
personally contribute, you're welcome to jump on over to [our
forum](https://groups.google.com/g/night-dos-kernel). Feel free to join and
help out the effort! :)
BTW, Jim! Thank you for highlighting our project in your video presentation! :D
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, February 5, 2021 7:28 AM, tom ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
>> I want to get "1.3" finally wrapped up, and I'd like to have a
>> "2.0" someday. The NightDOS folks are working
>
> english is not my first language so i could missread this.
> but doesn't 'folks are working' suggest a plurality of human being,
> opposed to the reality of a single guy who ever contributed, but is
> currently busy with other stuff
>
>> on their updated kernel - if they can get it working
>
> currently, after 5+ years of development they have functionality of a
> FreeDOS 512 byte bootsector: read a file from FAT16 into memory.
> that's it.
>
>> and still runs all 16-bit DOS applications,
>
> or run ANY application.
>
>> then we could include that as an alternative kernel
>> for people who (a) have a more modern system, and (b) opt-in to use it.**
>
>> ** But, NightDOS is a long way from being able to do that. The
>> goals of NightDOS are pretty lofty,
>
> and he has not the faintest idea how to get there.
> Tom
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
