> > Concurrent access to files is something already handled by SHARE > SHARE is all about access to *local* files, on the FreeDOS machine, and > has absolutely nothing to do with sharing remote files.
MSCLIENT uses SHARE as well, it complains if you don't have it loaded. My concern was more with the underlying disk/filesystem layer in dosemu. According to the latest dosemu2 release notes (end of January this year), this may have recently received some attention. https://github.com/dosemu2/dosemu2/releases "Implemented region locking and share support in MFS. One of the most requested/missed feature of dosemu1 times." - Darrin On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:54 AM tom ehlert <t...@drivesnapshot.de> wrote: > > > >> I was referring to the recommendation of using a "folder" as a drive > under > >> DOSEMU. I don't believe that solution supports multiple node access to > the > >> same folder. > >> > >> SMB (i.e. MSCLIENT and Samba) were designed for this use case. > > > What makes you think so? > > Just because it's true? in MSDOS at least. > However I have no idea if that is even implemented in FreeDOS, or > DOSEMU. > > > Concurrent access to files is something already handled by SHARE > SHARE is all about access to *local* files, on the FreeDOS machine, and > has absolutely nothing to do with sharing remote files. > > > Tom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-user mailing list > Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user >
_______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
