Hi list,

When I have a 2FA enabled user account, I receive the two password prompt for sudo at a host, even on hosts where 2FA is not required. This breaks Ansible for me, when using "become" with Ansible.

I am testing the [prompting/2fa] options in sssd to remediate this. I have the following configuration:

---
[prompting/2fa/sudo]
first_prompt = 'Please enter your password and optional OTP token value: '
single_prompt = True
---

This provides me with a single prompt, with the configured text when I run sudo on this host.

However the 2FA OTP code is no longer optional. If I do not enter both my password and an OTP code, the authentication fails. So still this does not fix Ansible for me.

From var/log/secure:
---
Jun 3 09:15:16 myhost.mydomain.tld sudo[2289804]: pam_sss(sudo:auth): authentication failure; logname=myusername uid=12345678 euid=0 tty=/dev/pts/1 ruser= myusername rhost= user= myusername Jun 3 09:15:16 myhost.mydomain.tld sudo[2289804]: pam_sss(sudo:auth): received for user myusername: 7 (Authentication failure) Jun 3 09:15:18 myhost.mydomain.tld sudo[2289804]: myusername : 1 incorrect password attempt ; TTY=pts/1 ; PWD=/home/myusername ; USER=root ; COMMAND=list
---


The only change performed is to add the above prompting configuration to sssd.conf. If I remove the prompting configuration from sssd.conf, I can now authentiate using only my password, even though with two prompts.

In either way, I am unable to run Ansible anymore.

Any suggestions on how to fix this?


Regards,
Siggi


_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to