Hey Albert, The changeing of record_ids and record_ids_length showed the sensor 5 (but no data) like this Record ID, Sensor Name, Sensor Number, Sensor Type, Sensor State, Sensor Reading, Sensor Units, Sensor Event/Reading Type Code, Sensor Event Bitmask, Sensor Event String 5, Power Meter, 5, Current, N/A, N/A, N/A, 9h, 2h, 'Device Enabled'.
IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG unfortunately did not add ANY more logs at all, so I tried with IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG_IPMI_PACKETS which gave me more logs. Those are quite a lot of more lines, so I pasted it into my privatebin: https://privatebin.florianstroeger.com/?58387298f9b913c4#CkDCOMP5eFXOs6Whn+giWtidWNhMZGrkhc3tXYPaK9o= I also tried setting discrete_reading to 1 as the sensor 5 was visible with record_ids, but that did output the same results. Florian On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:07 AM Albert Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> wrote: > Hey Florian, > > Lets try: > > unsigned int record_ids[] = {5, > 0}; > unsigned int record_ids_length = 1; > > and > > unsigned int ipmimonitoring_init_flags = IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG; > > Al > > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 20:16 +0100, Florian wrote: > > Oops, I'm sorry, Android-Mail apparently deleted the CC... > > > > I compiled with ipmimonitoring_init_flags = 1 now and got debug stuff > > this time. > > > > The output is following... > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, > > ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0xC0' not > > supported > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, 752): > > event_reading_type_code '0x70' bitmask is OEM > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, 752): > > event_reading_type_code '0x71' bitmask is OEM > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, 752): > > event_reading_type_code '0x71' bitmask is OEM > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, > > ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0x8' not > > supported > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, > > ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0x8' not > > supported > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571): > > cannot read sensor for record id '23' > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571): > > cannot read sensor for record id '24' > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571): > > cannot read sensor for record id '38' > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571): > > cannot read sensor for record id '39' > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571): > > cannot read sensor for record id '40' > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356): > > ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable > > (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571): > > cannot read sensor for record id '41' > > Record ID, Sensor Name, Sensor Number, Sensor Type, Sensor State, > > Sensor Reading, Sensor Units, Sensor Event/Reading Type Code, Sensor > > Event Bitmask, Sensor Event String > > ipmi_monitoring_sensor_read_sensor_bitmask_strings: success > > > > > > I'm unfortunately don't know much about C. You mean I should change > > in 'unsigned int record_ids[] = {0};' the 0 to a sensor-id, right? > > Because I did this and that neither worked with putting 5 in for the > > power meter nor with any other sensor. > > > > Florian > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:47 PM Albert Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> wrote: > > > Didn't see your output, I guess you forgot to paste it in. > > > > > > Hmmmm. That means the main monitoring code is just returning "0", > > > i.e. > > > 0 sensors read. Could you try experimenting with the settings and > > > setting "record_ids" to the record we're trying to figure out (i > > > think > > > it was #5 in your prior post). Lets just concentrate on that > > > specific > > > record and try to figure out what's going on. Also set > > > ipmimonitoring_init_flags for more debugging and lets see what gets > > > output. > > > > > > BTW, could you please respond to the mailing list. > > > > > > Al > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 07:50 +0100, Florian Ströger wrote: > > > > Hello Albert, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the fast reply! > > > > I've set 'int ignore_non_interpretable_sensors' to 0, but when I > > > run > > > > the binary now it just outputs the headers, like this: > > > > > > > -- > > > Albert Chu > > > ch...@llnl.gov > > > Computer Scientist > > > High Performance Systems Division > > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Albert Chu > ch...@llnl.gov > Computer Scientist > High Performance Systems Division > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > -- Florian Ströger Zur Rossschwemme 5 3452 Atzenbrugg ****************************
_______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel