Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Now, how to virtualize real/v86 mode is a whole other question ;-) > I really think we should get protected mode working first ... > B.t.w., in v86 mode, every software interrupt drops back into > protected mode as well (unless you use this semi-documented > 'extended v86 mode' ...) Speaking of virtual-8086 mode extensions, there is an even less documented protected mode virtual interrupts feature as well (PVI). I only found one article on PVI on the 'net. The x86.org site features an article http://www.rcollins.org/articles/pvi1/pvi1.html If anyone has other info on PVI, please let me know. The article above didn't cover everything but was very useful. Granted PVI was implemented properly, there may be some use of it for virtualization. From the article, it sounds like Intel implemented it in a broken way. When the time comes, I may revisit the PVI article, and do some real tests on the hardware to fill in the gaps left by it. -Kevin
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Mike Fox
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Chris Emerson
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ulrich Weigand
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ramon van Handel
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Kevin Lawton
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ulrich Weigand
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ulrich Weigand
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ramon van Handel
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Timothy J. Massey
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ulrich Weigand
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Kevin Lawton
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ramon van Handel
- Re: First FreeMWare release! Ulrich Weigand
- more FreeMWare technical thoughts... Kevin Lawton
- Re: more FreeMWare technical thoughts... Ramon van Handel
- Re: more FreeMWare technical thoughts... Kevin Lawton
- Re: more FreeMWare technical thoughts..... Ramon van Handel
- Re: more FreeMWare technical thoug... Kevin Lawton
- Re: more FreeMWare technical t... Ramon van Handel
- Re: more FreeMWare technical t... Kevin Lawton
- Re: more FreeMWare technical t... Ramon van Handel
