Re: Bug in att-decoder?

[Ulrich Weigand]

Jens Nerche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> att only means:
> user: decode.c:2811: i386_decode_text_att: Assertion `0' failed.
> Aborted

Yes.  Either you add a line ' case 0: break; ' or else you put the
whole switch in question into a 'if ( value )' clause.

The reaons is that for instructions that don't *have* a displacement,
the displacement_size is zero.

Bye,
Ulrich