>Jens Nerche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> att only means:
>> user: decode.c:2811: i386_decode_text_att: Assertion `0' failed.
>> Aborted
>
>Yes. Either you add a line ' case 0: break; ' or else you put the
>whole switch in question into a 'if ( value )' clause.
>
>The reaons is that for instructions that don't *have* a displacement,
>the displacement_size is zero.
Then why does the INTEL syntax work ? I just copied it from there...
I see you fixed my AT&T code but the INTEL code is still the same.
-- Ramon
