>That's why I suggested some days ago to reorg FreeMWare a bit and
>define primitives exported to other.... hm, let's say "modules" or so,
>like GUIs.
Those modules are called "plugins"... or am I missing something ?
I don't see the difference.
>With that we're easyly able to write some different
>"modules" to control FreeMWare. For example, may also be a desktop
>like GNOME or KDE wants to offer applications from other os' integrated
>in their desktop (no idea how this could look like, but possible) the
>GNOME or KDE guys write their own "module" for FreeMWare control,
>or a "marshalling module" could marshall the output and pump it over
>a net and so on...
Yes, that's completely possible with plugins. Why would you need
to reorg the code for this ?
-- Ramon
