On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote:
> Remember that these map files should be associated with an SVK, i.e
> defined for the entire subspace. If you keep that in mind, you should be
> able to simplify this proposal a bit.
Why should they be associated with a SVK? Combining map files and SSK
subspaces is confusing, because they are two very different systems. I
can't think of any situation where you would want to use both SSKs and map
files in the same directory structure. You might insert map files into a
subspace, so you can use pseudo-updating. But you wouldn't want to have
some files as SSKs and some files as entries in the map file.
I need to think this through again. Preferably without Nine Inch Nails
blaring... my moral standing is lying down, maybe I'm all messed up...
this is the only time I really feel alive...
--
Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
