> For example, FProxy looks up KSK@blah's CHK in the metafile, and finds > that its filename is "/chapter_01/misc/rabbit.html". The browser doesn't > know this -- it sees the URI "http://localhost:8081/KSK@blah", and assumes > that a relative link off KSK@blah to "image.gif" means > "http://localhost:8081/image.gif", because it has no idea about a map > file. So we would need to keep track of the state of our session -- what > directory we're in -- with cookies. And what about a relative link to > "../index.html"? It's nuts. No cookies needed. See earlier post. > > Besides, is "freenet:pigdogjournal:/index.html" really that ugly? Yeah. We're getting really carried away overloading the URI. I'm pretty much opposed to anything that tacks on additional crap to the URI. Scott
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FPro... Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Travis Bemann
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Travis Bemann