> For example, FProxy looks up KSK@blah's CHK in the metafile, and finds
> that its filename is "/chapter_01/misc/rabbit.html". The browser doesn't
> know this -- it sees the URI "http://localhost:8081/KSK@blah", and assumes
> that a relative link off KSK@blah to "image.gif" means
> "http://localhost:8081/image.gif", because it has no idea about a map
> file. So we would need to keep track of the state of our session -- what
> directory we're in -- with cookies. And what about a relative link to
> "../index.html"? It's nuts.
No cookies needed.  See earlier post.

> 
> Besides, is "freenet:pigdogjournal:/index.html" really that ugly?
Yeah.  We're getting really carried away overloading the URI.  I'm pretty much opposed 
to anything
that tacks on additional crap to the URI.
        

        Scott

PGP signature

Reply via email to